Save Sabah!

Save Sabah's Natural Heritage and Future Generations!

Archive for the ‘SaveSabah’ Category

Govt says no to coal power plants in Sabah

Posted by Save Sandakan On February - 19 - 2011

Posted on February 17, 2011, Thursday

KOTA KINABALU: The government has agreed not to build coal-fired power plants in Sabah.

Chief Minister Datuk Seri Musa Aman said the decision was made at the recent National Economic Advisory Council meeting chaired by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

“I am aware there are protests against the proposed construction of a coal power plant. Today, it’s proven that all the protests have been given due attention.

“The Barisan Nasional (BN) government under the prime minister’s leadership is a government that always listens to the voices and feels the pulse of the people. We have high determination and political will to make the decision which was not easy, namely not to build coal power plants in Sabah,” he told reporters after chairing the State Cabinet meeting here yesterday.

Musa expressed appreciation on behalf of the state government and Sabah people to Najib who had not only given serious attention to energy needs in Sabah but also showed high concern for the environment.

The proposed construction of a coal power plant in Felda Sahabat, Lahad Datu, to meet electricity supply needs in Sabah East Coast has previously received objections not only from local non-governmental organisations but also international activists.

In August last year, the Environment Department had rejected the Detailed Environmental Impact Assessment (DEIA) for the project but Tenaga Nasional Bhd (TNB), in its 2010 Annual Report, mentioned that “a reviewed DEIA report will be submitted for study and approval” for a 300MW plant.

“The prime minister also understands that among valuable assets that belong to Sabah is its appealing natural environment which is still preserved.

“We need to protect our treasure, particularly the natural environment because it is among major contributors to the state’s economic sector,” Musa added.

The growth of ecotourism activities and nature adventure tours, he said, depended on how far the natural treasure could be preserved and not exposed to any risks.

He said the government was aware of the problem of energy shortage in Sabah, particularly in the East Coast area.

In this regard, the federal and state governments had agreed to use liquefied natural gas (LNG) to generate power in the state, he said. — Bernama

http://www.theborneopost.com/?p=94058

Popularity: 5% [?]

Anti-coal group not majority

Posted by Save Sandakan On January - 14 - 2011

Forum

Published on: Sunday, January 09, 2011

Anti-coal group not majority
By: David Lee
I HAVE been reading every report in the local papers on the coal fired power plant for Sabah and the opposition seems to be as strong as ever.

The anti-coal-fired power plant group does not represent the silent majority who has not spoken one way or the other about the project proposal.

They would sooner have the electricity supplied to their homes and industries un-interrupted rather than to join in the debate.

They trust that the State and Federal governments would make the right decision with both the electorates and the environment in mind.

It would help to make the right decision if the decision makers make a study of the traditional coal user countries like China, Japan, Britain, European countries, Taiwan and Australia and see what damage had been done to the people and countries.

Countries like China, Britain and the European countries had been burning coal for a thousand years.

If coal use was that bad as some claimed, the damages would have been written on the faces of the people and the countries.

Queesnsland in Australia has the world’s biggest and longest coral reefs and the beaches are the world’s best. It is the paradise for tourists who go there by the millions each year.

The State of Queensland produces tens of millions of tonnes of coal for export each year.

In addition Queensland burns tens of millions of tonnes to produce some 8,000 MW electricity for decades. Over 70 per cent of the State’s energy needs came from coal. If our Sabah environmental activists claims of environmental disasters resulting from coal-fired plants are correct, the coral in the Great Barrier Reef off Queensland would have been all wiped out by now by the pollutants discharged from a dozen huge coal-fired power plants. Tourists would have stopped going there long ago.

Likeswise Britain and European countries draw the biggest tourist crowds.

Yet they are traditional coal users for centuries.

If those fish and coral off the Dent Peninsula were poisoned one day, it would not be the result of the as yet non-existing coal-fired plant, but due to the effluents from all the oil palm plantations and mills washed down to the sea. The run-off into the sea of excess NPK and other elements and temperature of the surrounding sea water over time and would adversely affect the marine life, coral included.

Even now, after 30 years of extensive agricultural activities on the east coast,. the sea water chemistry may have already changed.

But we did not have a base line study 30 years ago. So we don’t know what changes had taken place.

Whatever harm the oil palm industry may bring on the environment, there is no turning back.

The industry is deeply rooted in Sabah’s economy.

Looking at things in global perspective, I think George Wehrfrits who wrote in Newsweek Dec, 17,2007, summed up the situation aptly about the inevitable continuing would-wide coal use.

“It isn’t just Pandas the World Wildlife Fund is hugging. In a major policy shift, the group is cautiously embracing a longtime foe of the greens: King Coal. Its report titled Climate Solutions; WWF’s Vision for 2050, maps out a plan for doubling global energy consumption while slashing greenhouse-gas emissions by 60pc – the minimum necessary to limit global warming to 2 degrees C.”

“Amid the usual call for renewable, WWF envisions coal delivering 20pc of global energy needs in 2050.

Why coal? Because there is no silver “bullet” to stop global warming, says Liam Salter, head of WWF’s climate-change programme in Hong Kong. Nor is it practical to rule out the dirty coal but abundant fossil fuel.

The report envisions “a clearly defined, though limited, role for coal in a climate-friendly economy.”

Coal would fire highly efficient (and still experimented) power plants that store CO2 underground.

Conservation would help bridge the gap between now and 2030, when the new coal plants will be ready.” G.W. Newsweek.

As if in response to the WWF’s favorable assessment about coal usage the Indonesian miners are going full steam ahead with their coal mining and coal-fired power generation. Our neighbour is top coal producer/exporter in this region. By 2017 it will burn about 100 million tonnes of coal to generate electricity as its oil and gas reserves are depleting fast. What do you say about the effect of climate change from Indonesia’s coal power plant emission compared to our burning of mere 1 million tones?

Indonesia will double coal production to 400 million tonnes per year by 2017. It earns tens of billion US. dollars from coal export.

Who is going to stop the country from burning and exporting CO2 to Malaysia and other consumer countries?

Even the so-called green energy sources like oil and gas, hydro, biomass are all polluting energy sources. Our local NGOs should have gone to the Gulf of Mexico to help scoop up the scum from the recent oil spill and bury the birds to realise the effects of oil and gas pollution.

If we were to go total green we would need millions of tonnes of iron and copper ores and millions of tonnes of coal to refine and smelt the raw materials into finished metals to manufacture all the steel and other metals needed to fabricate oil and gas pipes, the monster rigs, the huge hydro turbines, hundreds of biomass plants, thousands of wind mills etc to produce 3,000 MW electricity that Sabah will need.

Sabah has all the raw natural resources like iron ore, coal, copper ore, manganese, nickel and other metals and minerals. But NGOs will have to mine them, refine them and turn them into finished ready-to-use metal products in order to be able to manufacture all those turbines, plants, mills, etc, to produce the “Green Energy” that some had been advocating.

But the Green Turf members said: “Absolutely no mining in Sabah”.

We have to come to our senses. No mining means no Green Energy!

The environmental activists might suggest that we could import all that from China.

But it would be a crime to export pollutants to another country. China’s sky would be all darkened by industrial pollutants and many of its citizens will choke to death if it continues to supply world needs for the steel and other manufactured products, while Sabah and the rest of the world enjoy the pristine environments and bright skies.

Where is our conscience?

Why can’t we have our cake and eat it too? Beause the Chinese are getting smart. They are following the footsteps of the Japanese who, in turn, had been following the footsteps of the Western world.

Rather than building more factories at home Chinese are now shifting their heavy industries and factories to the third world and even to the developed western worlds like United States and produce the goods they need in their own backyards!

The Chinese are coming to Sabah, too, to build huge aluminum plants, cement plants and all other plants to produce the goods that we need.

Hurray! The world trading creed has come full circle.

Sabah seems to be the only State which has been gripped by environmental activist movement.

The movement seems to be wielding enormous political influence as it is probably supported morally and financially from its rich foreign counterparts.

The local movement has been attracting foreign environmentalists who find the state fertile ground to carry out their mission.

They come to Sabah for one or two days and make fantastic praises about Sabah’s environment-eco-paradise, exotic species, pristine forests, lost world, world heritage quality, 8th wonders ,etc, and expect their pronouncements to be carried in the local newspapers. Must be real experts to be able to assess Sabah’s wonders in such a short time!

Their mission is to create a virtual clean and green state so that those fragile flora and fauna will thrive over humans. Every development – a road passing though conservation area to a kampong is considered harmful to the speies and the project has to be stopped.

Mining for river sand, (vital to our infrastructural development), on a 100 meter stretch of a big, 300km long river is to be stopped because some tourists and some monkeys in the nearby forest didn’t like the sight of the operation.

Some of our high government officials are already infected and are dancing to their tunes.

Minister Datuk Chin must have done some reading to come up with the statement that “most countries in the world are still heavily dependent on fossil fuels as their main source of energy.

We cannot run away from such traditional fuel sources”. Well said. But this is not the type of song the activists like to hear!

Can one imagine United States which depends 45pc of its energy on coal and China (60pc on coal), together consuming some 2.5 billion tonnes of coal annualy, were to suddenly go for green energy?

They would have to exploit and deplete the whole world’s mineral resources in a short time, including our Maliau Basin coal and iron in order to achieve the objective.

Whatever decisions the governments will make on the proposed Tunku coal-fired power plant, I hope it will not be founded on fictional scary tales of environmental disasters but on well researched data and on world-wide trend on coal usage.

The environmental authorities should be rational and be realistic and should not reject the whole project proposal just because there are some spelling mistakes here and there in the EIA reports.

Bear in mind that whatever project for the humans and species, and the governments and public agencies have carried out many such projects over the years, there is no escape but at the expense of the environment.

Chin, don’t throw out the baby with the bath water in frustration!

http://www.dailyexpress.com.my:80/read.cfm?NewsID=543

Popularity: 10% [?]

The Devastating Effects of Coal Ash Pollution in China

Posted by Save Sandakan On September - 19 - 2010

 

Friday, September 17, 2010

Images of devastating effect of Coal Ash pollution in China, the same effect that might happen in here in Sabah, if we let them build the coal plant in Kg. Sinakut.

1) http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/gallery/2010/sep/16/pollution-coal-ash-china#/?picture=366690638&index=0

2)  http://www.greenpeace.org/raw/content/china/en/press/reports/coal-ash-report-english-2010.pdf

 

Harmful substances Health impacts :

Antimony          Eye irritation, heart damage, lung problems
Arsenic             Cancer, skin lesions, hand warts
Barium              Gastrointestinal problems, muscle weakness, heart damage
Beryllium           Lung cancer, pneumonia, respiratory problems
Boron               Reproductive problems, gastrointestinal problems
Cadmium          Lung disease, kidney disease, cancer
Chromium        Cancer, ulcers and other stomach problems
Cobalt              Lung, heart, liver and kidney problems; dermatitis
Copper            Respiratory and nervous system damage, liver disease
Lead               Nervous system damage, brain damage, development and behavioural problems
Manganese     Nervous system damage, muscle problems, neurological problems
Mercury           Cognitive deficiency, stunted growth, behavioural problems
Molybdenum    Mineral imbalance, anemia, developmental problems
Nickel               Cancer, lung problems, allergic reactions
Selenium         Birth defects, impaired bone growth in children
Vanadium        Birth defects; lung, throat and eye problems
Zinc                 Gastrointestinal and reproductive problems
Chlorides         High blood pressure
Fluorides         Dental fluorosis, skeletal fluorosis
Nitrates           Reacts in stomach to form carcinogenic substances
Sulphates        Stimulates the gastrointestinal tract

Table 1 The health impacts of key harmful substances present in coal ash .

Popularity: 23% [?]

Pro-coal group adds new twist to coal controversy

Posted by Save Sandakan On September - 8 - 2010

 

Sun, 29 Aug 2010 12:45

By Queville To
KOTA KINABALU: The controversial proposal to build Sabah’s first coal-fired power plant has taken a new twist with the arrival of a new pro-coal pressure group, the People’s Assembly Action Committee (PAAC).
The newly formed pro-coal lobby has incurred the wrath of anti coal-fired power plant coalition, Green SURF (Sabah Unite to Re-Power the Future), for claiming that the people in the east coast of Sabah support the project.
Green SURF’s Wong Tack, who is also Sabah Environmental Protection Association (Sepa) president, challenged PAAC chairman A Nagaraju to give full details of his claim.
He said Nagaraju should also reveal who exactly are the people that he was referring to and as to who was backing his campaign.
“The people have been saying no to this project since it was proposed in Silam, Lahad Datu and then was forced to shift location to Sandakan due to health and environmental concerns and then driven out of that district also.
“We formed Green SURF last year when Sinakut (in Lahad Datu) was proposed as the third site. We have seen support for the coalition grow from day to day, and even individuals have come in to help us.
“We would like to ask Nagaraju who are the majority of people in Sabah’s east coast who want this project,” Wong said in a statement today.
He also noted that PAAC had just emerged from nowhere, following the rejection of the Detailed Environment Impact Assessment (DEIA) by the Federal Department of Environment.
Wong was responding to a recent media report in which Nagaraju claimed that his group represented those on the east coast of the state who wanted economic development.

Rejected three times

He also questioned PAAC’s tactics to attract people to a pro-coal rally organised by them in Lahad Datu on Aug 21, pointing out that freebies like caps and t-shirts were given out to lure the public.
The Federal Department of Environment (DOE) rejected in mid-August the Detailed Environmental Impact Assessment (DEIA) that was submitted by Lahad Datu Energy for the 300 megawatt plant on the shores of the Sulu Sulawesi Marine Eco-region (SSME).
Wong noted that Green SURF had received close to 500 copies of letters from the public, addressed to the DOE questioning the DEIA and calling on the government to scrap the project.
He said that even a poll conducted among members of the Lahad Datu Chinese Chamber of Commerce showed that 86.2 per cent objected to the proposed plant.
The project has now been rejected three times and that any appeal for it to proceed is an insult to the people and the democratic process, he said.
State Tourism, Culture and Environment Minister Masidi Manjun subscribed to this, he said, when he was quoted as saying he hoped any decision by the project proponent to re-submit a DEIA was “dictated by conscience and public opinion.”
“This whole issue has angered the people of Sabah. We wonder why this Action Committee is so eager to see the continuation of this project when we should be focusing our attention on finding alternatives to solve the power shortage problem,” he said.

Against Copenhagen agreement

Though the plan to build the plant has come up against strong and unrelenting grassroots opposition, the federal government has largely turned a deaf ear to their pleas, arguing that the energy plant is necessary to power Sabah and stop blackouts.
Critics have reportedly said that the coal plant will damage fish stocks with chlorine and thermal discharges, upend the lives of locals dependent on fishing, and devastate eco-tourism in the region.
In addition, the coal plant goes directly against Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak’s agreement at Copenhagen to reduce the country’s carbon emission intensity by 40 percent by 2020.
Despite these concerns, the plant has continued to move ahead possibly due to nepotism, corruption, and kick-backs, according to sources who requested anonymity.
They claim nearly a quarter of the cost of the coal plant or RM400 million has been paid to the contracted company, China National Electric Equipment Company (CNEEC) to build the power plant.
The thinking at the time was that the project would be approved as coal is listed in the country’s five-fuel policy.
When first proposed it was estimated at RM1.1 billion, then RM1.3 billion for the second site, and now RM1.7 billion, a RM400 million jump from one site to the next.
No one knows if the total cost includes the cost of building a transmission line, or the route this transmission line will follow. It also not known which coal mines in Kalimantan will supply the plant or how long they plan to export coal from Indonesia.

TNB’s role


Much of the speculation on the relentless pressure to build the plant centres around national power utility, Tenaga Nasional Berhad (TNB) and its chairman Leo Moggie, a former federal minister.
TNB has always been pushing for the coal plant and an advertisement was even published in several Sabah newspapers arguing for such a plant.
In addition to this allegation, sources said that the deal for the coal plant is not transparent and may be linked to politically connected individuals.
They said certain well-connected citizens control the import of coal from Kalimantan and and according to published plans, the coal plant will be powered by mines in Indonesian Borneo.
Environmentalists fear that if the plant goes ahead, it will spur coal mining in Sabah’s own backyard, destroying the state’s last pristine eco-systems.
The Renewable and Appropriate Energy Laboratory (RAEL) at the University of California Berkeley, which was hired by Green SURF to conduct an energy audit for Sabah found that power from either biomass or hydropower could provide the same power at a competitive price with coal.
Apart from SEPA, the other members of Green SURF are Land Empowerment Animals People (LEAP), WWF-Malaysia, Malaysian Nature Society (Sabah branch) and Partners of Community Organisations (Pacos).

http://freemalaysiatoday.com/fmt-english/politics/sabah-and-sarawak/9755-pro-coal-group-adds-new-twist-to-coal-controversy

Popularity: 15% [?]

Sepa mulls legal action if ‘flawed DEIA’ adopted

Posted by Save Sandakan On August - 5 - 2010

KOTA KINABALU :  The Sabah Environmental Protection Association (Sepa) said it will resort to legal action if the Detailed Environmental Impact Assessment ( DEIA) report on the proposed 300MW Sinakut coal-fired power plant is approved by the Department of Environment.

“If the Department of Environment approves the DEIA without consideration and though a process not acceptable to Sabahans, it leaves us with no choice. Sepa will take the issue to court,” said Sepa President Wong Tack.

“We have consulted our legal team and many concerned Sabahans have pledged financial support for it. We are firm that any irresponsible action by the project proponent and approval agencies will be met with the strongest action from the people of Lahad Datu and Sabah.

“We are not against anybody but only to protect crucial ecosystems like Darvel Bay which affects Sabah’s long-term interests and food security,” Wong Tack said.

“The social study in the DEIA also does not reflect the mood of the people in the immediate and larger area of Lahad Datu,” Wong Tack said.

“Ground activities over the last month recorded 500 people had turned up on the proposed project site in Sinakut, 100km from town and a further unexpected 1,500 people turned up at an anti-coal forum on July 24 in Lahad Datu,” he noted.

“We can see a groundswell of opposition against the coal-fired power plant because nobody in the East Coast or Sabah want the best source of seafood at their backyard to be turned into a garbage dump for independent power provider, Lahad Datu Energy.

“The mood on the round is very clear and we hope that the Government reads that message and takes it seriously,” Wong Tack said.

Nonetheless, he said Sepa welcomed Chief Minister Datuk Musa Aman’s appointment of Datuk Masidi Manjun, Minister of Tourism, Culture and Environment to look into the matter.

“We are thankful to the Chief Minister for having looked at the people’s concern seriously and appointing the rightful State Ministry under Masidi to look at the matter,” Wong Tack said in a statement, Sunday.

“That alone has restored the State’s dignity for the people of Sabah and State agencies,”he added.

“We are also very grateful to Masidi for his press statement Friday that the decision and the responsibility is in the hands of the State Government and the State Cabinet.

“This is the right thing to do and we are quite confident, now, with Masidi’s leadership, a positive decision will be made with Sabah’s long-term interest at heart,” Wong Tack said.

On the basis of Sepa’s outright rejection of the DEIA, Wong Tack claimed that firstly, Sabah’s members of the Panel of Review of which Sepa was one, had rejected the Terms of Reference (TOR) at a meeting held in Putrajaya last November.

The objection was due to crucial parameters which were very pertinent to the proposed site such as the Sulu Sulawesi Marine Eco-region and the Coral Triangle Initiatives which had already identified Darvel-Semporna Bay as a Priority Conservation Area for years, were left out of the TOR.

“During that meeting it was advised that the consultants work with or consult State agencies, NGOs and the people of Sabah but none of that happened,” he claimed.

“Subsequent to that TOR meeting, the State Minister (Masidi) requested a second review of the Terms of Reference be held in Sabah but again nothing happened and yet the original Terms of Reference was approved and came back to us with hardly any amendment,” Wong Tack said.

“That means our opinions, our inputs and comments expressed during the TOR meeting were totally ignored.

“Because the original Terms of Reference was approved in a hasty manner and imposed on us, Sepa attended the July 27 DEIA review at Kedah Room, Federal Building, Kota Kinabalu, under protest, making it clear at outset that we rejected the DEIA on grounds that it didn’t follow due process required of a detailed EIA.

“So the stand that we now go public with is not new. Every member of the Panel of Review heard it, including the consultants and project proponents,” Wong Tack Said.

“And during the DEIA Review meeting State agencies questioned why clean and green technology options were totally left out in the study but the consultants’ reply was their scope was limited to coal,” he said.

“Because they seem insistent on looking at only a narrow limit and not any other options while Green Surf of which Sepa is a member knew there are feasible renewable alternatives from our study done by a US energy expert which report has been made public.

Hence we have good reasons for rejecting the Terms of Reference and the DEIA,” he said.

“Our fellow NGOs had exposed false and blatant non-factual information in the DEIA report. SEPA’s stand now is that the consultants involved should be dropped,” Wong Tack said.

“We hope Masidi will engage local consultants to do a detailed study but Sepa’s opinion is that over the last eight years, under the well publicised Sulu Sulawesi Marine Eco-region and Coral Triangle Initiative of which Malaysia is a signatory, there is enough scientific information there to decide that this coal-fired power project in Darvel Bay should be scrapped, right now,” he said.

“Both Malaysian and international marine scientists have spent years looking at this area and pushing for marine conservation under this Coral Triangle Initiative where 15 million people in the SSME and 35 million in the Coral Triangle depend on for their livelihood.

“There is enough information about the ecological importance of Darvel Bay and no further study is necessary.”

Daily Express 2nd Aug 2010 .

Popularity: 20% [?]

Timer

VIDEO

TAG CLOUD

Sponsors